There's nothing spectacular about the experience of using it. In addition, we saw clearly better to follow the news of his favorite artists, because no section is dedicated to it. The algorithms, however, remain minimal when it comes to automatic suggestions, but it is a long way from the power of Google Play Music or the variety of Spotify for example. So we go around the owner quickly and discoveries are very rare if you do not take the time to search for yourself. This approach can be found in the playlists and suggestions: The proposals are not numerous and, above all, the editorial is very poor.
Normally you will find your favorite artists easily, but it is not excluded that some albums are missing. In practice, this service is very general and tries to touch many different genres of music without being complete in all genres. To stand out, Amazon Music offers an extensive catalog with more than 50 million titles. Amazon offers a very small benefit to its premium subscribers, namely the ability to subscribe to an annual offer of € 99.99. The offer of the American Juggernaut is priced in line with that of its competitors (€ 9.99 / month). Amazon Music, the minimum service Premium: $ 9.99 / month – $ 99.99 € / year for Amazon Prime subscribersĪrrived late, Amazon still wants to co-determine in the battle of the services of streaming musical. SoundCloud Go +: Frequency analysis (left) and audio stream spectrogram (right) on Audacity Click to enlarge.
The user experience is very similar to the browser version. No computer application is officially planned Only the mobile app is available (iOS and Android). His community aspect, the strength of the service (tracking artists, comments from users and artists, relies on his page, share with friends) is still relevant, because its interface, not always very intuitive or organized.
#QOBUZ VS DEEZER FREE#
Aside from what's already in the free formula and in Go, Go + does not bring any really exclusive content or features. SoundCloud Go + is missing despite a very correct variety of content: Often we find unavailable titles / albums and missing artists compared to what we can find in the competition.
In contrast to the original catalog of SoundCloud these titles come directly from agreements with record companies and labels, as they are to be found in the other services of streaming. This offer adds about 30 million titles to the counter. It is also possible to subscribe to another premium formula for € 9.99 / month: SoundCloud Go +.
#QOBUZ VS DEEZER FULL#
You can find our full file on this formula if you want to know more about what it has in store for you. Thanks to this, SoundCloud is the perfect place to find future talents, at least in some musical styles (electro, hip-hop, rap, pop …). Since mid-2016, SoundCloud has been offering the pay-per-view of SoundCloud Go ($ 4.99 / month) for ad-free access to its massive catalog (over 125 million songs) directly from the artists. The service, which was accessible free of charge and without advertising, had to change its policy in the face of pressure from rightholders. The Story of SoundCloud in the World of Streaming Musical is atypical. SoundCloud Go +, the UFO Premium: 9,99 € / month Qobuz HiFi: Frequency analysis (left) and spectrogram of the audio stream (right) on Audacity. Fortunately, the various rates collected by Qobuz have been downgraded to match those of the competition … HiFi formulas starting at € 19.99 / month are no better than their competitors.
#QOBUZ VS DEEZER 320 KBPS#
In terms of value for money, Spotify and Apple Music fare better with a premium subscription of $ 9.99 per month as Qobuz distils only MP3 320 kbps in its basic formula. In terms of the quality of listening, which should be the strength of Qobuz, the service does not stand out. Nevertheless, it is possible to import files from the catalog of the service to a reader. Storage and playback of personal music files is not possible on Qobuz unlike other services. Small detail that may annoy some: The albums are not listed in chronological order. Just like Tidal or Amazon, a small mistake or mistake can keep you from finding the artist you're looking for. However, in terms of indexing, we have seen a more effective approach. At the moment, the experience it offers is especially satisfying: The navigation is smooth, either on the computer application (Windows / OS X), smartphones (Android / iOS) or browser. The Qobuz interface has undergone numerous facelifts and optimizations, especially to homogenize the experiments on the different platforms.
0 kommentar(er)
